The petitioner withdrew the petition after the respondent sought to add Section 66-A IT Act allegations. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Vardhman Kaushik with Mr.Karan and Ms.Monalisa Kosaria, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
..... Respondents
Through : Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC. Mr.Nikhil Goel, Advocate, for CBI. SI Braham Prakash, PS Ranholla.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R D E R % 12.02.2018
S.P.GARG, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2018/ sa
Archana Kumari
The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & Ors
S.P. GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
