Laxman v. State & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In CRL.A. 425/2018, the Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal as withdrawn after the appellant sought withdrawal and the state counsel distinguished the ruling in Nishu Wadhwa.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~8
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.A. 425/2018
LAXMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gaurav Sharma and Mr. S. Pandey, Advocate
versus
STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Harkesh Meena
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 14.11.2018
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has referred to the ruling in Nishu Wadhwa Vs. Siddharth Wadhwa and Anr., 2017 (161) DRJ 305 to submit that the impugned order is not an interlocutory order.
The counsel for the appellant at this stage having taken instructions submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the captioned appeal.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal may be permitted to be withdrawn after submission regarding it not being an interlocutory order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
LAXMAN
- respondent
STATE & ORS
Coram
R.K.GAUBA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court