The judgment dismissed a writ petition in default as the petitioner was absent for the hearing and the matter had been called twice. The court also noted the settlement agreement was unrelated to the absent petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
..... Petitioners
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
..... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Matter has been called twice. None is present for the petitioners. The settlement agreement which has been placed on record is also not related to the petitioners.
It is apparent that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the litigation; petition is dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2018 SU
Raj Bala
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
