Bal Kishan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Single bench of High Court of Delhi dismissed criminal appeal in default due to appellant's failure to appear, while directing police to trace him for revival of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed in default; permission granted to apply for revival upon appearance; personal bond and surety bonds cancelled.
What the court decided
$~R-11
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.A. 390/2002
BAL KISHAN ..... Appellant Through: None.
versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R % 05.01.2018
- None appears for the appellant.
- This appeal was admitted way back in 2002 and on 05th August, 2005 the sentence was suspended. From the memo of parties it is seen that the Appellant has his permanent address in Farukkabad, U.P.
- As pointed out by the learned APP, Appellant has not complied with the condition in the order granting suspension of sentence, to report to the SHO Ambedkar Nagar on the 7th of each month. The police officer from PS Ambedkar Nagar is not in a position to inform whether the Appellant is available at the given address.
- The present appeal has been shown on the regular board of this Court for
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal needs to be set on a regular board for hearing given the appellant's non-appearance despite prior orders.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
BAL KISHAN
- respondent
STATE
Coram
S.MURALIDHAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court