Petitioners approached for protection; no FIR lodged against them. Due to non-prosecution, the petition was dismissed. A separate application regarding exemption was allowed subject to exceptions.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
NEERU DOGRA & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through : None. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate. SI Sonu, PS G.T.B.Enclave.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R D E R % 05.02.2018
Crl.M.A.No.2169/2018 (Exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 364/2018
S.P.GARG, J.
FEBRUARY 05, 2018/ sa
Neeru Dogra & Anr
State of NCT of Delhi Ors
S.P. Garg
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
