Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition and联络 due to lack of State intimation regarding apprehension of a respondent, granting liberty to revive the matter if the State apprehends the respondent in the FIR.
Disposed of with liberty to revive if State apprehends Respondent No.1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
STATE ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State
versus
VIRENDER YADAV & ANR ..... Respondents
Through:
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
I.S. MEHTA, J.
APRIL 16, 2018 sr
STATE
VIRENDER YADAV & ANR
S. MURALIDHAR
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
