The Delhi High Court in a single-line order granted leave to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioner approached a National Lok Adalat and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28# $~
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Piyush Singhal and Mr. Yash Kotak, Advocates for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Mukesh Balyan, PS IGI Airport.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 19.09.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition
as the petitioner has approached the National Lok Adalat.
Leave granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 19, 2018 ‘vn’
Rajiv Kamotra
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
