Himmat Singh v. Commissioner of Customs
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
Versus
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submits that despite issuance of five notices for personal hearing, the petitioner has chosen not to appear before the Customs Department.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no such notices have been received, nevertheless the petitioner is ready and willing to join proceedings. He submits, upon instructions, that the petitioner shall appear before the Adjudicating Authority in terms of the notice issued to him.
In the circumstance, copies of the previous notices as well as latest notice shall be served to the petitioner by 18.12.2018, through counsel as well.
The petitioner shall appear before the Adjudicating Authority on the date so fixed.
In view of the above, the petition is not pressed on merits. It is disposed-off in the above terms.
A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
DECEMBER 12, 2018 RW
HIMMAT SINGH
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court