The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition by accepting a copy of an order passed by the respondent which revoked the petitioner's suspension.
The petition is disposed of as it has become infructuous upon the revocation of the petitioner's suspension by the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6.
RANGANATHAN SUBRAMONI MONI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Ohri and Mr. Rudra Pratap Singh, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
O R D E R % 15.02.2018
Mr. Kirtiman Singh has tendered in court a copy of the order dated 13.02.2018 passed by the respondent, which is taken on record. By the said order, the suspension of the petitioner has been revoked. Consequently, the restrictions placed on the petitioner in pursuance of the said suspension order also do not survive. The present petition has, therefore, become infructuous and is disposed of as such.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
P.S.TEJI, J
FEBRUARY 15, 2018 sr
RANGANATHAN SUBRAMONI MONI
UNION OF INDIA
VIPIN SANGHI
P.S. TEJI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
