The court held that the writ petition became infructuous and was disposed of as the Ministry of External Affairs cancelled its endorsement order and discharged the petitioner.
None. The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
NIZAR BEN MONCEF ALLAGUI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Ramni Taneja, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
%
O R D E R 19.04.2018
Mr. Sharma has tendered in Court the order dated 18.04.2018 passed by the Ministry of External Affairs in exercise of Section 29 of Extradition Act, 1962 vide which the Central Government has cancelled its order of endorsement of foreign warrant dated 17.08.2017 and withdrawn its order dated 17.08.2017 passed under Section 17 read with Section 15 of the Extradition Act, 1962 and discharged the petitioner - Nizar Ben Moncef Allagui.
In view of the said order, copy whereof is taken on record, this petition does not survive, as the same has become infructuous.
The petitioner stands disposed of.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
P.S.TEJI, J
APRIL 19, 2018/ PB
2 provisions across 1 enactments
NIZAR BEN MONCEF ALLAGUI
UNION OF INDIA
VIPIN SANGHI
P.S.TEJI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
