Sudha Jain v. State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi disposed of a criminal petition and a pending application as not pressed, as the petitioner had passed away and the proceedings had abated.
What did the court decide?
Petition and pending application disposed of as not pressed due to abatement.
What the court decided
$~16
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 3017/2015 & CRL.M.A. 10743/2015 SUDHA JAIN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Mudit Jain & Ms. Barkha Rastogi, Advs.
versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State. Mr. Puneet Rai, Standing counsel for Income-tax department.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 30.07.2018
The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed away and, therefore, the proceedings against her having abated, this petition is not pressed and may be disposed of accordingly.
The petition and the pending application are disposed of as not pressed.
R.K.GAUBA, J
JULY 30, 2018 nk
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUDHA JAIN
- respondent
STATE
- respondent
ANR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court