Disposed
Shyam Kumar v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/2847/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Order on office note requiring payment of costs. Petitioner filed costs. No further orders required. Judgment is advisory without legal principles.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~34
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 2847/2018 SHYAM KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: None
¶4
versus
¶5
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: None
¶6
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
¶7
- O R D E R
¶8
- % 30.01.2019
¶9
Petition is listed on an office note as the receipt of the cost has not been filed.
¶10
The same has now been filed by the petitioner.
¶11
No further orders are required to be passed.
¶12
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shyam Kumar
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court