Tilak Raj @ Bannal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ranbir Singh Kundu, ASC for the State with Ms.Suman Saharan, Advocate and SI Mehrab Alam, PS Nabi Karim
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 12.12.2018
By this petition, the petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to look after his aged mother and maintain social ties. As per the nominal roll, the petitioner has been granted furlough with effect from 31st October, 2018 for a period of 3 weeks.
In view of the fact that the petitioner has recently availed furlough for a period of three weeks, this Court finds no ground to grant parole further. Petition is dismissed.
Copy of this order be communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
DECEMBER 12, 2018 mamta
1 issue framed by the court
Whether parole should be granted considering the petitioner availed furlough for 3 weeks.
TILAK RAJ @ BANNAL
STATE
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court