Disposed

Mohit Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC6 Feb 2018W.P.(CRL)/2670/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court heard a matrimonial case where the wife wished to live with her husband against parental dissent. The court directed police to provide safe passage to the parties and cautioned the father-in-law against taking law into hand, ensuring there is strict safety.

What did the court decide?

Direct police to provide safe passage to petitioner, his mother and wife; cautioned respondent No. 4 against taking law in hand.

Mohit Kumar Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2670/2017

¶4

MOHIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr.Prashant Singh, Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

¶8

¶9

O R D E R 06.02.2018

¶10

Ms. Veerpal Kaur wife of the petitioner is present with her parents. Petitioner is also present with his mother. We have interacted with Veerpal Kaur in chamber. We have also interacted with the parents of Veerpal Kaur in chamber. We also called the petitioner and his mother in chamber in the presence of Veerpal Kaur. Veerpal Kaur states that she would like to live with her husband. The parents of Veerpal Kaur, including respondent No. 4 are, however, not willing to accept this matrimonial alliance between their daughter and the petitioner. We, therefore, sought assurance from the petitioner and his mother that Veerpal Kaur shall be properly looked after since she is

¶11

taking an important decision of her life to go with the petitioner even to the displeasure of her parents. The petitioner and his mother both have assured this court that they shall take due care of Veerpal Kaur and shall provide all love and affection that she deserves, considering the fact that her parents are now estranged.

¶12

In these circumstances, we direct the police to provide safe passage to the petitioner, his mother and Veerpal Kaur to their residence. The SHO, Police Station – Bhalaswa Dairy and the DCP concerned shall ensure that proper safety and security is provided to the petitioner, his family members and Veerpal Kaur from any threat or harm that may come from respondent No. 4 or his family. We have also cautioned respondent No. 4 not to take law in his hands. In case any calls are received from the petitioner, his family members or Veerpal Kaur, the police is directed to seriously attend to the same. The mobile phone number of the Beat Constable of the area and the SHO concerned shall be provided to the petitioner and Veerpal Kaur for this purpose.

¶13

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶14

Dasti.

¶15

VIPIN SANGHI, J

¶16

P.S. TEJI, J

¶17

FEBRUARY 06, 2018

¶18

B.S. Rohella

Mohit Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohit Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuj Kaushik Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Pinku @ Kailash & Ors. Vs the State & Anr.

Arun Kumar Vs the State & Anr.

Sanjay Aheria & Ors. Vs State (Govt.of NCT Delhi)& Anr.

Ravinder Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Vinod Kumar Vs the State (N.C.T of Delhi)

Hira Lal & Anr. Vs State & Ors.

Aslam & Ors. Vs State (the NCT of Delhi)& Ors.

Anuj Kaushik Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mukesh Chand Kaushal Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

A Vs State & Anr.

Ghulam Mohd. Bhat (in Jc) Vs National Investigation Agency

Deepak Vs State & Anr.