The court quashed an FIR registered under sections 354B, 323 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties. The investigation was complete, and the parties consented to the quashing.
FIR No.10/2016 and all proceedings arising therefrom were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
VISHAL PANWAR &ANR ..... Petitioners
Through : Ms.Anju Garg, Advocate. versus STATE ( NCT ) OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP with SI Baljit Singh, PS Mianwali Nagar. Mr.Mohit Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr.Augustine Chatterjee, Advocate for R2 & R3 along with R2 & R3 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 17.05.2018
CRL.M.A.No. 9459/2018 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 2664/2018
Page 1 of 2
disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with their free consent and they have no objection to quashing the FIR in question.
S.P.GARG, J
MAY 17, 2018 / tr
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR and proceedings should be quashed after the dispute has been settled amicably with the consent of the parties.
Whether keeping the proceedings pending serves any useful purpose after settlement of the dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishal Panwar
State (NCT) of Delhi
S.P. Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
