The court disposed of a petition regarding the custody of the petitioner's daughter, Anupama, raised under IPC 376 and POCSO. The court directed the CWC to ascertain the girl's age and decline to interfere with custody pending CWC directions.
no further directions granted; matter remitted to CWC for custody and age enquiry
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
VINOD PRASAD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nipur Saxena, Advocate.
versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Chaitanya Gosai, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Inspector Sushil Kumar & SI Prity Bala.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
O R D E R % 08.03.2018
dated 14th August 2016. While she declined to undergo gynaecological examination, her statement was recorded under Section 164 of Cr PC by the learned Link Metropolitan Magistrate (‘MM’) on 20th February 2018. She stood by her previous statement and declined to return to her parents. On the same day, when she was produced before the Child Welfare Committee (‘CWC’) at Kalkaji, she again declined to return to her parents. The Chairperson, CWC directed her to be taken to Prayas Shelter Home, Tuglakabad where she is presently lodged.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
I.S. MEHTA, J.
MARCH 08, 2018 bh
VINOD PRASAD
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
S. MURALIDHAR
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
