Dismissed
Rakesh Sehgal v. State
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./2398/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed in default as no one appeared for the petitioner on the second call, after it had been passed over once previously.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed in default.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~16
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.M.C. 2398/2017
¶4
RAKESH SEHGAL ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: None. versus
¶6
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP.
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 08.01.2018
¶9
Matter has already been passed over once. Even on second call no
¶10
one appears for the petitioner.
¶11
Petition is dismissed in default.
¶12
A.K. PATHAK, J.
¶13
JANUARY 08, 2018
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
RAKESH SEHGAL
- respondent
STATE
Coram
AI extract
A.K. PATHAK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court