The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No.224/2014 under IPC Sections 457, 380, 411, 120-B and 34 upon settlement between parties, execution of a compromise deed, and receipt of Rs.2,50,000 by the complainant officer.
FIR No.224/2014 and consecutive proceedings quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
DHEERAJ SACHDEVA & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr Sanjeev K.Bhardwaj with Mr Navin Saini, Advocates for Mr Utsav Saini.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
..... Respondents
Through : Ms Anita Abraham, Addl. PP for the State. ASI Bijender Kumar, PS Swarup Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R
% 17.01.2018 Crl. M.A. 924/2018(exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 237/2018
Crl.M.C.237/2018
Page 1
Rs.2,50,000/- to respondent No.2.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
JANUARY 17, 2018 ‘Sn’
Crl.M.C.237/2018
Page 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR seeking quashing under Section 457/380/411/120-B/34 IPC can be quashed upon settlement and payment.
Whether the court can quash proceedings upon settlement and receipt of compensation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dheeraj Sachdeva & Anr
The State, Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
