The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition following a status report confirming the recovery and identification of the deceased's body. No further directions were issued.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction that no further directions are called for as the body has been identified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
NAVENDU KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocate with Ms. Iyina Grover, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate. Insp. Raman Kumar, ATO Uttam Nagar with SI Sumit, PS Uttam Nagar.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R
% 07.09.2018
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
SEPTEMBER 07, 2018 / tr
Navendu Kumar
The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
S. Muralidhar
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
