Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR alleged under Sections 307/326/34 IPC and Arms Act sections 25/27/59 citing a settlement. Counsel sought to withdraw the petition, resulting in the court dismissing the petition as withdrawn at an interlocutory stage.
Petition for quashing of FIR dismissed as withdrawn. Order dated 03.05.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
AKASH & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. RK Bachchan, Adv.
versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R % 03.05.2018 CRL.M.A. 8304/2018 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 2334/2018
Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.906/2016, PS Mangol Puri, under Sections 307/326/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25/27/59 of the Arms Act, 1959 submitting to the effect that a settlement has been arrived at between the parties.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the present petition, which is thus dismissed as withdrawn.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
MAY 03, 2018 vm
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing of FIR can be dismissed on withdrawal by the petitioners in the absence of substantive disposal on merits?
Whether a settlement reached between parties can lead to the quashing of FIR under relevant sections of IPC and Arms Act?
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Akash & Ors.
State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
