Tahir @ Sahil v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought parole to find a suitable match. Court noted the petitioner had already been granted multiple furloughs in 2018 after jumping parole and being re-arrested. Finding no ground for parole, the petition was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petition seeking parole and challenging rejection was dismissed.
What the court decided
$~38
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 2258/2018 TAHIR @ SAHIL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Mayank Mikhail Mukherjee, Advocate
versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for the State with ASI Lakhmi Chand, PS Khajuri Khas
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 13.12.2018
- By this petition, petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to search a suitable match for himself and also challenges the communication dated 29th June, 2018 whereby his application seeking parole on the ground aforesaid was rejected.
- A perusal of the status report reveals that the family of the petitioner is residing at House No.195, Gali No.1, Kidwai Nagar, PS Lisadi Gate, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. Petitioner has two brothers who are working and can thus look after the family.
page 1 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 2258/2018
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole on the grounds of finding a suitable match.
Whether the rejection of the petitioner's parole application dated 29th June 2018 is sustainable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tahir @ Sahil
- respondent
State
Coram
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court