Dismissed

Mohammad Salim v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC12 Jul 2018W.P.(CRL)/2037/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner moved for habeas corpus to produce his wife. Court found wife, now a major, wished to reside with petitioner. Father agreed. Petitioner granted safe passage to residence by police assistance. Petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions; the application stands disposed of with direction to SHO for safe passage.

Mohammad Salim Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Child Custody and Guardianship | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~10.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 2037/2018 MOHAMMAD SALIM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Advocate

¶4

versus

¶5

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Chaitanya Gosain for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing counsel for GNCTD with Insp. Ajit Kumar,SI Shailendra Kr. Singh, PS Gokul Puri.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

¶7

O R D E R % 12.07.2018

¶8

Crl.M.A. No. 12415/2018

¶9

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

¶10

W.P.(CRL) 2037/2018

¶11

Issue Notice. Mr. Chaitanya Gosain accepts notice on behalf of Mr. Rahul Mehra, standing counsel for GNCTD. Respondent No.3 is present in Court and accepts notice.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek a writ of habeas corpus for production of his wife–Tarannum, who he claims to have married on 07.11.2016. The claim of the petitioner is that respondent No.3– father of Tarannum took her away from the matrimonial home and since

¶13

then she has not been returned to join the petitioner. The status report is tendered in Court and is taken on record.

¶14

Tarannum is also present in Court. We have interacted with her in Court. She states that she married the petitioner and would like to reside with him. We have also interacted with respondent No.3 on the aspect that Tarannum being a major, is entitled to take her own decision in this regard. He is agreeable to the same.

¶15

Accordingly, we direct the SHO, PS Gokul Puri to ensure the safe passage of the petitioner and Tarannum from the Court itself to their residence. Tarannum may collect her personal belongings from her parental home. The SHO, PS Gokul Puri shall ensure that the said process is completed without any untoward event. The SHO, PS Gokul Puri shall promptly attend to any complaint from the petitioner or Tarannum in relation to any threat or coercion being exercised by respondent No.3 or his family members.

¶16

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶17

Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

¶18

VIPIN SANGHI, J

¶19

I.S.MEHTA, J

¶20

JULY 12, 2018 N.Khanna

Mohammad Salim v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Salim v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sikander Vs State

Meenu Dahiya Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Aam Foundation Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

P.K.Verma & Ors. Vs State(Nct of Delhi)& Anr.

Aparna Gupta Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mass Tech Controls Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Shakti Singh & Anr. Vs State & Ors.

Rukhwani & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Raj Kumar Prasad Vs Clouds M Pharmaz Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Haneef Khan Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

State of NCT of Delhi Vs Satya Prakash Verma

Jaspreet Singh Raghu Vs State of Delhi & Anr.

State Vs Manjeet Singh @ Pauwa

Ram Murti Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.