Allowed
Ramu Pandey v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/1905/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner convicted under Section 302 IPC moving for parole to file SLP and maintain social ties. Court granted parole for 4 weeks due to lack of recent misconduct and deep roots in society.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted parole for a period of 4 weeks by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two surety bonds of the like amount.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~14
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 1905/2018
¶4
- RAMU PANDEY ..... Petitioner
¶5
Represented by: Mr.Gautam Kharanchi, Advocate
¶6
- versus
¶7
- STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for the State with Insp.Jagdish RAi, PS Karol Bagh
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
¶9
- O R D E R
¶10
- % 02.07.2018
¶11
- Notice.
¶12
- Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State accepts notice.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the petitioner qualifies for parole after serving nearly five years in custody.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
RAMU PANDEY
- respondent
STATE
Coram
AI extract
MUKTA GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court