Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a petition and applications for condonation of delay were sought. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn and the miscellaneous application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MANISHA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. K. Prabhakara Rao, Adv.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R D E R % 15.01.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner will file a
Revision Petition before the Sessions Judge against the impugned order along with an application for condonation of delay. Learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JANUARY 15, 2018 r.bararia
MANISHA
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
