Puran Singh @ Vipin v. State of NCT of Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
The court, on a representation by the State that the petitioner's medical arrangements and accommodation have improved, refused to pass any further orders regarding the Writ Petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 1876/2018
PURAN SINGH @ VIPIN ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor, Advocate. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC (Crl.) GNCTD for Mr.Kamna Vohra, ASC (Crl.) GNCTD with SI R.S.Pandit, P.S. Preet Vihar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 16.08.2018
The learned Additional Standing Counsel for State, upon instructions states that the petitioner has been accommodated in a separate cell with two inmates of his choice with attached western toilet and therefore, there would be palpable relief in his inconvenience, if any. She further states that the petitioner was also taken to a Doctor outside the Jail i.e. the OPD at DDU Hospital and the medications as advised by the said Doctor is being administered to him.
In view of above, no further orders are required.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court