Rame Tamang v. the State & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1.
RAME TAMANG ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Saini, Advocate with petitioner in person.
versus
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with SI Karamveer Singh, AHTU/ Crime Branch, SI Vipin Kumar, South East District.
THE STATE & ORS
%
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R 03.08.2018
The petitioner’s daughter-R has been produced. We have interacted with her in chamber. She states that her parents and siblings are all living in Nepal. The petitioner was earlier working as a guard in Shimla where he was residing with his family-including his daughter-R, but now he has shifted with his family to Nepal. She states that her father has come only to rescue and pick her up and that she would be returning to Nepal with him. She states that she does not wish to live in Sanskar Ashram, Dilshad Garden or any other place, and she would like to return with the petitioner-her father.
Since R is a major and wishes to return to her native place with her
father-the petitioner, the same possibly cannot be obstructed by any authority. Accordingly, she is permitted to return with the petitioner. She may pick her belongings from Sanskar Ashram, Dilshad Garden and thereafter leave with the petitioner. No obstruction shall be caused in this process either for the petitioner or for his daughter.
The petition stands disposed of in the above said terms. Dasti under the signatures of Court Master.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
I.S.MEHTA, J
AUGUST 03, 2018 nk
RAME TAMANG
THE STATE
VIPIN SANGHI
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court