Petitioner sought extension of parole expiring on 5th May, 2018. Court found no ground for extension as required medical tests had not been performed despite being advised earlier. Petition dismissed.
Extension of parole to the petitioner dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
JEET RAM SHARMA ... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Jitendra Sethi, Mr.Hemant Gulati and Ms.Anshika Sethi, Advocates
| versus | |
|---|---|
| STATE NCT OF DELHI | ... Respondent |
| Represented by: | Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for the |
| State | |
| Mr.Nikhil Goel with | |
| Mr.Gurpreet Hora and | |
| Mr.Ashutosh Ghade, | |
| Advocates |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 03.05.2018
By this application the petitioner seeks extension of parole granted to him which is expiring on 5th May, 2018.
A perusal of the documents filed along with the petition would reveal that the petitioner got himself examined with the Neurology and Cardiac Centres of the AIIMS and finally on 24th April, 2018, he was advised blood test for Lipid Profile, Vitamin B12, T3, T4, TSH, Endocrinology opinion, Cardiology opinion with 2D echo test and Holter and to continue Anti Platelets, Anti Hypertensive medicine. From 24th April, 2018 till date these tests have not been got performed. W.P.(CRL) 1329/2018 Page 1 of 2
Considering the medical documents placed on record this Court finds no ground to extend the parole to the petitioner at this stage.
Petition is dismissed.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 03, 2018 ‘rk’
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 1329/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether parole granted to the petitioner should be extended on account of his medical condition.
Jeet Ram Sharma
State NCT of Delhi
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
