Petitioner sought permission to withdraw criminal petition reserving contentions about second respondent's complicity for trial court. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SHIV KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate with petitioner in person.
versus
STATE (G.N.C.T DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State with SI Rajesh Kumar, PS Dabri. Mr. Dhananjai Kaushal, Adv. with Mr. Dhruv Kaushal, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R
% 18.09.2018
After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition, reserving all the contentions set out in the petition qua the complicity of the second respondent in the crime, to be urged before the trial court.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 vk
Shiv Kumar
State
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
