Partly allowed

Sanjeev Aggarwal v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC15 Jan 2018W.P.(CRL)/125/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Mukt Gupta disposed of a writ petition and criminal miscellaneous application by directing the petitioner to cooperate with investigation. The court allowed an exemption application subject to exceptions and ordered a two-week notice before arrest if material emerges.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to cooperate with investigation; two-week notice before arrest if implicated as accused.

Sanjeev Aggarwal Vs State & Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 125/2018

¶4

SANJEEV AGG	ARWAL	..... Petitioner
	Represented by: versus	Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.K. Dubey, Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Ms. Apoorva Pandey and Mr. G.G. Kashyap, Advocates.
STATE & ANR	Represented by:	..... Respondent Mr. Richa Kapur, ASC for State with SI Durgadas, PS Saket.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.	JUSTICE MUKT	A GUPTA

¶5

O R D E R % 15.01.2018

¶6

Crl.M.A. NO. 783/2018 (Exemption)

¶7

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶8

W.P.(CRL) 125/2018 and Crl.M.A. No. 782/2018 (interim directions)

¶9

The grievance of complainant Sandeep Aggarwal in FIR No. 478/2016 under Sections 109/420/465/467/468/471/120B/34 IPC registered at PS Saket, Delhi is that he had to resign as a Director of the company because of his conviction and thereafter the management of the start up was with Radhika Ghai, Sanjay Sethi and Nupur Sethi who committed cheating and forgery.

¶10

W.P.(CRL) 125/2018 Page 1 of 2

¶11

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the CEO, Founder and Senior Manager Director CNPL. He further states that the investment, if any, by the petitioner’s concern is in the first tranch and the allegations of the complainant, if any, relate to the third and fourth tranch of the investment.

¶12

When this court granted no coercive action against the other people to twist the arm, notice has now been given to the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer.

¶13

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on instructions from the Investigating Officer states that the petitioner had only been summoned as a witness at this stage and until no material comes against the petitioner, the Investigating Officer does not wish to array him as an accused. It is only in case some material comes against the petitioner, that he will be implicated as an accused.

¶14

Considering the statement of learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State, the writ petition can be disposed of at this stage itself directing the petitioner to co-operate in the investigation as and when required. However, in case the Investigating Officer feels that there is some material against the petitioner and he has to be implicated as an accused and required to be arrested, notice for a period of two weeks before arrest will be given to the petitioner.

¶15

Petition and application are disposed of. Order dasti.

¶16

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

¶17

Page 2 of 2

¶18

JANUARY 15, 2018/‘yo’ W.P.(CRL) 125/2018

Sanjeev Aggarwal v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Aggarwal v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangelal Sunil Agrawal Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ashwin Alias Kakey Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Reena Vs State Govt.of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Manoj Pal Lalwas Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mayank @ Mannu & Anr. Vs State (Gnct of Delhi) & Anr.

Vivian Khoiwal Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Manish Bajaj & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Bikramjeet Singh Sokhi Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Ashwin Alias Kakey Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Amit Kumar & Anr. Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Dalip @ Ballu Vs State ( Govt NCT of Delhi)

Ritesh & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Anup Gupta Vs State & Anr.

Jamia Arabia Nizamia Welfare Education Society Vs State & Ors.