Kuhu Pandeya v. State & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of a bail petition as the underlying charge proceedings were dismissed. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~8
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 1231/2015
KUHU PANDEYA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K. Sultan Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya, Adv.
versus
STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State. Mr. Jagjit Singh, Mr. Preet Singh & Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advs for R-2 & 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 24.07.2018
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order dated 18.02.2015 impugned in this petition was set aside by the Court of Sessions by judgment dated 09.08.2016 in Crl. Rev. 125/2016 preferred by the State and in the consequence the private party respondents are facing criminal proceedings and the charge for offence under Sections 498A/34 IPC, the present petition assailing the order of charge earlier passed does not survive and is accordingly withdrawn.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KUKU PANDEYA
- respondent
STATE
Coram
R.K. GAUBA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court