Allowed

Sourabh Sharma & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC13 Apr 2018W.P.(CRL)/1080/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court quashed an FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and disposed of the writ petition. The court found that the dispute between the petitioners and the complainant had been amicably settled, divorce by mutual consent was granted, and the remaining settlement amount was paid in court.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.39/2017 and all proceedings arising therefrom were quashed; the writ petition was disposed of.

Sourabh Sharma & Ors. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~29

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 1080/2018

¶4

SOURABH SHARMA & ORS ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through : Ms.Shashi Jaiswal, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Ms.Sushila, proxy counsel for State with Insp.Dorothia, PS G.Bagh. Ms.Priyanka, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant in person.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 13.04.2018

¶7

CRL.M.A.No. 6632/2018 (Exemption)

¶8

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶9

The application stands disposed of.

¶10

W.P.(CRL) 1080/2018

¶11

Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.39/2017 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Gulabi Bagh. It is stated that the matter has been settled amicably with the complainant / respondent No.2.

¶12

Complainant / respondent No.2 is present with counsel and has been identified by the Investigating Officer. I have enquired from the complainant if she has settled the dispute with the petitioners

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

amicably without any fear or pressure. She has informed that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with her free consent and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question. Divorce by mutual consent has already been granted. Pursuant to the settlement, remaining amount of ` 50,000/- by way of manager’s cheque bearing No.042633 dated 12.04.2018 drawn on HDFC Bank have been given to the complainant in the Court today. 3. The petition is supported by affidavits of the parties. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to settle in life after divorce, FIR No.39/2017 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Gulabi Bagh and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶15

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶16

S.P.GARG, J

¶17

APRIL 13, 2018 / tr

¶18

Page 2 of 2

Sourabh Sharma & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sourabh Sharma & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Piyush Chopra Vs the State & Anr.

Rohit Chopra & Ors. Vs the Stae & Anr.

Ahmed Shoukeen Vs State

Dhanwanti Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Mohd Sabir Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Gaurav Kumar & Anr. Vs State & Anr.

Kishan Singh Chauhan & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sandeep @ Samman Vs State

Imran Vs the State NCT of Dlehi

Nagma Vs State & Ors.

Kamlesh Kumar Magnani Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Pooja Kalra Vs Addl Director of Revenu Intelligence

Joginder Kumar Vs Addl Director of Revenue Intelligence