Petition disposed of after verification that order dated 12.01.2018 was complied with. No further directions issued. Parties allowed other remedies per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
KAYUM ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shiva Bhardwaj & Mr. Pramod Prasad, Advocates.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Tushar Sannu, Prashant Singh and Chaitanya Gosain, Advocates with SI Balbir Chand and Insp. Yogesh Malhotra, SHO, PS. Khajoori Khas.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
O R D E R % 19.01.2018
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
I.S. MEHTA, J.
JANUARY 19, 2018/ nd
KAYUM
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
S. MURALIDHAR
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
