The petitioner in three connected criminal leap petitions expired in January 2018. Legal heirs did not pursue the matters. The petitions were dismissed as abated as none of the legal heirs appeared to continue the litigation.
The petitions in CRL.L.P. 105/2015, 107/2015, and 108/2015 were dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11 to 13
Through : None.
versus
DEEPAK GUPTA & ANR ..... Respondents Through : None.
MANMOHAN PRAKASH ..... Petitioner
Through : None.
versus
DEEPAK GUPTA & ANR ..... Respondents Through : None.
Through : None.
versus
DEEPAK GUPTA & ANR ..... Respondents Through : None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
Crl.L.P.105/2015 & connected matters
Page 1 of 2
O R D E R
%
09.05.2018
S.P.GARG, J.
MAY 09, 2018/ sa
At this stage, Mr.Suresh Sharma, Advocate puts appearance on behalf of the petitioner. He informs that legal heirs of the deceasedpetitioner have not contacted him to pursue the petition. He is apprised of the above order.
S.P.GARG, J.
MAY 09, 2018/ sa
Crl.L.P.105/2015 & connected matters
Page 2 of 2
MANMOHAN PRAKASH
DEEPAK GUPTA & ANR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
