This court disposed of a contempt petition filed by DAVINDER SHARMA. Counsel conceded the respondents passed a speaking order on December 19, 2017. The court allowed exemption and closed the contempt petition pending a substantive petition challenging the order.
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions; Contempt petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Ateepriya Bhatia, Adv.
versus
CHANDER SHEKHAR & ANR
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Adv. with M. Gauri Chaturvedi, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 12.02.2018
CM No. 47072/2017
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CONT.CAS(C) 859/2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that the respondents
have passed a speaking order on December 19, 2017. She seeks to withdraw
the contempt petition to enable the petitioner file a substantive petition challenging the said order in accordance with law. The contempt petition is
closed.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2018 /ak
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can withdraw the contempt petition to file a substantive petition challenging the respondents' speaking order.
DAVINDER SHARMA
CHANDER SHEKHAR & ANR
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
