Petitioner withdrew a contempt petition after seniority was re-determined by the Supreme Court pursuant to a previous order allowing the CRPFs appeal. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
EX CPL B S SIDDHA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Tiwari, Adv.
versus
L C GOYAL & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. with Mr. Deepak, Law Officer, CRPF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R D E R % 10.04.2018
Learned counsel for the respondents state, in terms of the order of the Supreme Court dated August 23, 2017, by which the Appeal filed by the CRPF has been allowed, the seniority has been re-determined.
In view of the fact that based on the directions of the Supreme Court respondents have re-determined the seniority, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the contempt petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
APRIL 10, 2018 /jg
CPL B S SIDDHA
L C GOYAL
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
