Petition challenging arbitration award was dismissed as infructuous after respondent clarified the award did not apply to the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
versus
SRS INVESTMENTS BENGAL TIGER LTD. & ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Tejas Karia, Mr.Surjendu Sankar Das, Ms.Amee Rana, Ms.Avlokita Rajvi, Ms.Aishwarya Narayanan, Advs. for R-1 Mr.Aniket Bhatta Charyya, Adv. for R-2-3. Mr.Pradeep Aggarwal, Mr.Karan Khanna, Mr.Arjun Aggarwal, Advs. for R-4 to 7.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 22.05.2018
Counsel for respondent no.1 submits that the reference to ‘respondents’ in the Impugned Award dated 5th October, 2017 and/or in the clarification order dated 4th October, 2017 is only to respondent nos.1 to 6 in the arbitration proceedings and not to respondent nos.7 and 8, the petitioners herein. He submits that the Impugned Award is not passed against the petitioners herein and therefore, the present petition is not maintainable as it has been filed under a misconception that the Award is also against the petitioners. The counsel for respondent no. 1 clarifies that there is no Award against the petitioners herein.
Having recorded the above clarification, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MAY 22, 2018 RN
Ravi Todi
SRS Investments Bengal Tiger Ltd.
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
