Petitioner sought to withdraw an appeal-arbitration matter on grounds that the arbitrator had passed the award, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty to approach legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
ASHIMA INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Ms.Risha Mittal and Mr.Anant Reshin, Advocates.
versus
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.
..... Respondent Through : Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Mr.Philomon Kani, Ms.Kriti Handa, Ms.Hansika Sahu, Ms.Daini K, Advocates with Mr.Sanjay Kumar officer in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R
% 12.01.2018
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition as learned arbitrator has passed the award and petition has becomes infructuous.
In the circumstances, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. The petitioner is at liberty to resort to legal remedies available to it. No order as to costs.
YOGESH KHANNA, J
JANUARY 12, 2018 M
Ashima Infrastructures Private Limited
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
