Review petition wherein the court clarified that a previous paragraph contained only a prima facie opinion, not a binding final finding on the merits, before disposing of the petition.
Review petitions disposed of with clarification that prior observation was prima facie and not binding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27 to 29
MUBARAK OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.P.D.Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhishek Gupta, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Nemo
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R % 06.07.2018 IA 8546/2018 in OMP (I) (Comm.) 164/18 IA 8548/2018 in OMP (I) (Comm.) 165/18 IA 8552/2018 in OMP (I) (Comm.) 166/18
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Rev.Pet.247/2018 Rev.Pet.248/2018 Rev.Pet.249/2018
The petitioner is aggrieved with the observations made by this Court in paragraph 14 of its order dated 15th May, 2018. It is submitted that these observations are being treated as final by the respondents.
I may clarify that paragraph 14 contains only prima facie opinion of this Court and can in no manner be treated as binding or as the final finding on merits of the claim of either party.
The review petitions are disposed of with the above clarification.
Dasti.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J JULY 06, 2018 RN
MUBARAK OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED
UNION OF INDIA
NAVIN CHAWLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
