The court dismissed the withdrawal application in the company petition but directed the petitioner to provide payment details to the provisional liquidator in a connected matter.
Petitioner directed to provide details of payments to the provisional liquidator.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~CP-37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ELCTRONICA FINANCE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ashish Gaur, AR-in-person. versus
LUMAX AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms.Anubha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Adv. for the OL.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
O R D E R
% 12.03.2018
The authorised representative of the petitioner, namely, Mr. Ashish Gaur is present in person. He seeks to withdraw the present petition.
A perusal of the petition shows that it is Mr.Ashish Gaur, Senior Officer of the petitioner company who has signed the petition and has also given an affidavit in support of the petition.
As requested, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
All pending applications also stand dismissed.
Learned counsel for the OL however points out that in other connected matter, the OL has been appointed as a Provisional Liquidator for the respondent Company. He submits that the petitioner should give details of the payments received from the respondent Company. Needful be done by the petitioner.
JAYANT NATH, J
MARCH 12, 2018 rb
ELCTRONICA FINANCE LTD.
LUMAX AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS LIMITED
Jayant Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
