Urmila Devi & Ors. v. Ravi Dutt
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed in default due to the absence of the petitioners, who failed to appear despite repeated calls and previous adjournments for appearance.
What did the court decide?
The petition and the application filed therewith were dismissed in default.
What the court decided
$~4
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CM(M) 969/2015 & CM 23348/2015
- URMILA DEVI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: None.
versus RAVI DUTT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Singh with Mr. D.K. Singh & Mr. Trivendra Chauhan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 12.02.2018
There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners on the matter being called out repeatedly since morning, even though, it was passed over awaiting appearance in the forenoon. It is 4.20 p.m. The position remains the same.
The petition and the application filed therewith are dismissed in default.
R.K.GAUBA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2018 srb
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
URMILA DEVI & ORS
- respondent
RAVI DUTT
Coram
R.K. GAUBA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court