Allowed
Ram Sarup v. N D M C
Delhi HCCM(M)/353/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The learned Single Judge permitted the withdrawal and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~8
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CM(M) 353/2016
¶4
| RAM SARUP | Through: versus |
..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Kumar Sharma with Ms. Sunena, Advocates along with petitioner in person. |
|---|---|---|
| N D M C | Through: | ..... Respondent Mr. Tarunvir Singh Khehar, St. Counsel for NDMC with |
| Mr.Rajendra Yadav, Mr. Simar Pal Singh & Mr. Abhimanyu Gupta, Advocates. |
¶5
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
¶6
O R D E R % 08.02.2018
¶7
After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits, on instructions, that he may be allowed to withdraw the petition.
¶8
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
¶9
R.K.GAUBA, J
¶10
FEBRUARY 08, 2018 srb
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ram Sarup
- respondent
N D M C
Coram
AI extract
R.K. Gauba
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court