Disposed
Sanjay Kumar Malhotra v. Anil Kumar Jain
Delhi HCCM(M)/274/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
SANJAY KUMAR MALHOTRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate.
versus
ANIL KUMAR JAIN ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
O R D E R % 15.01.2018
The petitioner is one of the parties impleaded as respondents in the eviction case instituted by the respondent on the ground of bona fide need under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. It appears the other party impleaded as respondent i.e. Rajesh Kumar Malhotra has died on 16.11.2013, at a stage when separate applications for leave to contest submitted by both the said parties including the petitioner, were still pending. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order dated 17.11.2014 on the application under Order XXII Rule 4 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on the ground this creates an error as without substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased party, the case ought not proceed.
The counsel, however, concedes that the petitioner is at liberty to raise this as an issue of law at the stage of consideration of his leave to contest application.
CM(M) 274/2015
Page 1 of 2
In view of above, the counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition for any relief. It is disposed of accordingly. The pending application also stands disposed of.
R.K.GAUBA, J
JANUARY 15, 2018 srb
Page 2 of 2
CM(M) 274/2015
Sanjay Kumar Malhotra
Anil Kumar Jain
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court