Petitioner assailed orders declining framing of additional issues and treating certain issues as preliminary. Counsel sought withdrawal during hearing; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~74
CORAM:
Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 16.07.2018 of the learned ADJ-03, Rohini Courts, Delhi in CS No. 58782/16 vide which the prayer made by the petitioner herein seeking framing of additional issues with regard to the ground of resjudicata was declined, and vide which the prayer seeking that issues no. 3, 4, 5 & 7 be treated as preliminary issues, were declined.
At this stage after some submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition, which is thus dismissed as withdrawn.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2018/MK
Dal Chand
Charan Singh Sharma & Ors.
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
