backdrop of she having been subjected to forcible sexual intercourse by the said Vikas and at his instance by certain others. The same prosecutrix had also lodged a complaint on 10.10.2017 with Police Station Uttam Nagar which was translated into FIR No. 2/2018 on 04.01.2018 for offence punishable under Section 506 IPC. Noticeably, in the said complaint dated 10.10.2017, which would be anterior to the lodging of the FIR in the present case, allegations of criminal intimidation constituting offence punishable under Section 506 IPC were levelled only against the husband, i.e. Vikas, this also to the effect he was threatening to commit suicide, his parents also being involved in the harassment and they having raised illicit demands for dowry. Similarly, the same prosecutrix had lodged another complaint on 17.10.2017, this involving offence punishable under Section 325/34 IPC. Undoubtedly, in the said complaint dated 17.10.2017, she attributed a role in the physical assault leading to grievous hurt being caused not only by the husband Vikas and two others but also the petitioner herein, she also expressing grievance that she was subjected to insult by use of some casteist comments. Noticeably, in the said complaint dated 17.10.2017, she would not attribute any such previous history of forcible sexual intercourse by any person including the husband or others. Noticeably again, in the said FIR she would also express that she wanted to live with her husband, i.e. Vikas, which desire expressed so clearly has to be contrasted against the allegations made in the present FIR.
