Single Judge dismissed a third anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner in a rape case, noting his concealment of previous rejections and failure to join the investigation, deeming it inappropriate for bail given the offence's gravity.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed; pending applications disposed of; non-bailable warrants remain against accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47 *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**
DECIDED ON : 16th APRIL, 2018
STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
S.P.GARG, J. (Oral)
BAIL APPLN.812/2018 Page 1 of 3
taken by the police. The petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation.
BAIL APPLN.812/2018 Page 2 of 3
of the case.
(S.P.GARG) JUDGE
APRIL 16, 2018 / tr
BAIL APPLN.812/2018 Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in light of repeated failures and non-joining of investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anshul Malik
State
S.P. Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
