The bail petitioner briefly approached the court for anticipatory bail regarding an FIR but did not press the petition with liberty to file a better one subsequently.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a better petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate.
versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State with SI Manoj Kumar, PS-Malviya Nagar. Mr. J.P. Singh, Advocate for complainant.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 12.07.2018
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 774/2016 registered under sections 448/34 IPC at Police Station Malviya Nagar. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that section 82 proceedings have been initiated against her because despite service of non-bailable warrants, she has not joined the investigations. The next date in the section 82 proceedings is due on 16.07.2018. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor also submits that it is not that the petitioner is not aware of the proceedings. She has filed six complaints on the basis of FIRs registered as under:-
New Delhi.
In the circumstances, the petition is not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage with liberty to file a better one at a later stage.
It is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
JULY 12, 2018 RW
GEETA CHAUHAN
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
