Amar Singh v. the State
Case brief
What is this about?
The court granted bail to the petitioner, uncle of the deceased's husband, in a case involving dowry allegations. Bail was subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety, with the application marked dasti.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner admitted to bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the trial court.
What the court decided
$~4
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 679/2018 AMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.S.K. Kashyap, Adv. versus
THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. Insp.Rajesh Shukla ATO Hauz Qazi.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R D E R % 06.07.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the uncle of husband of the deceased. Petitioner along with his wife and family was living on the ground floor; whereas deceased along with her husband and father-in-law were living at the first floor. Petitioner had no reason to interfere in the life of deceased’s family on day-to-day basis. It is further submitted that allegations against the petitioner is that they used to taunt the deceased for insufficient dowry.
Petitioner is in custody for about four months. Chargesheet has been filed.
Keeping in mind the totality of facts and circumstances of this case, petitioner is admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in custody case arising from alleged dowry harassment.
Whether the petitioner fulfills the necessary conditions for bail under the totality of circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AMAR SINGH
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
A.K. PATHAK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court