Imran @ Mannu v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Short order granting bail to the petitioner under personal bond of `10,000/- with one surety, noting that witnesses have been examined and the injured discharged.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner admitted to bail on furnishing personal bond of `10,000/- with one surety.
What the court decided
$~11
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 630/2018 IMRAN @ MANNU ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Astha and Mr. Farooq Chaudhary, Advs. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with SI Sonu Singh, P.S. Ghazipur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 03.07.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for the last one year and four months. Complainant as well as eye witnesses have already been examined. Injured was discharged from the hospital after five days of the incident.
Keeping in mind the facts and circumstances of this case, petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Bail application is disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JULY 03, 2018/ ga
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail subject to furnishing bond and surety.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
IMRAN @ MANNU
- respondent
STATE
Coram
A.K. PATHAK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court