Allowed

Khem Singh Negi v. the State ( NCT of Delhi)

Delhi HC3 May 2018BAIL APPLN./577/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench granted anticipatory bail to petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an offence under Sections 376/377/420 IPC. Conditions included personal bond of Rs. 40,000, joining investigation, and not contacting the prosecutrix.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 40,000 with one surety, subject to joining investigation and not contacting the prosecutrix.

Khem Singh Negi Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 577/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.4733/18

¶4

KHEM SINGH NEGI ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through : Mr.Bharat Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Nitin Joshi & Ms.Anindita Das, Advocates.

¶6

versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP with SI Rampal. Mr.Jatin Sapra, Advocate for the complainant.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R

¶9

¶10

03.05.2018

¶11

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.127/2018 registered under Sections 376/377/420 IPC at PS Mehrauli. Status report is on record.

¶12

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. By an order dated 14.03.2018, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then. Perusal of the status report reveals that the prosecutrix and the petitioner were acquainted with each other since long. Physical relations allegedly took place between the two albeit on the alleged promise to marry. The victim is a married lady having two children. FIR No.276/2017 under Sections 323/506 IPC was lodged by her

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

against the petitioner at PS Sector-40, Gurugram. Apparently, there is delay in lodging of the FIR.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

¶16

The petitioner shall not contact the prosecutrix and shall not criminally intimidate her in any manner.

¶17

The bail application stands disposed of.

¶18

S.P.GARG, J.

¶19

MAY 03, 2018 / tr

¶20

Page 2 of 2

Khem Singh Negi v. the State ( NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khem Singh Negi v. the State ( NCT of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinay Verma Vs State & Anr.

Ashish Siroliya Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Anchal Chauhan Vs the State & Ors.

Mushahid Ali Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Ravi Kant & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Deepa Singh & Ors. Vs Staet ( NCT of Delhi)