Allowed

Zahid Hussain v. State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC17 Apr 2018BAIL APPLN./555/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No. 0751/2015. Conditioned on the deposit of security and furnishing of bond, bail was ordered subject to compliance of conditions regarding police investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners admitted to anticipatory bail; ordered to deposit ` 1,00,000/- each and furnish bond of ` 40,000/- with one surety.

Zahid Hussain Vs State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~7 and 8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 555/2018

¶4

ZAHID HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Vijay Kinger, Advocate with Ms. Roopa Nagpal, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. SI Shailendra Kr. Singh, PS Gokulpuri, Delhi. Mr. Y.P. Sharma, Advocate for Complainant.

¶8

+ BAIL APPLN. 559/2018

¶9

MOHD. YUNUS ..... Petitioner

¶10

Through: Mr. Vijay Kinger, Advocate with Ms. Roopa Nagpal, Advocate.

¶11

versus

¶12

STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. SI Shailendra Kr. Singh, PS Gokulpuri, Delhi. Mr. Y.P. Sharma, Advocate for Complainant.

¶13

CORAM:

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 17.04.2018

¶15

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No. 0751/2015 registered under Section 406/420/34 IPC at Police Station Gokul Puri. Status report is on record.

¶16

2 I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the BAIL APPLN. 555/2018 & connected matter Page 1 of 2

¶17

learned counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, offered to deposit ` 1,00,000/- each on behalf of the petitioners without prejudice and subject to future adjustment (if any) with the Registrar General of this Court.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioners’ offer to deposit 1,00,000/- with the Registrar General of this Court without prejudice and subject to future adjustment (if any), the petitioners are admitted to anticipatory bail and in the event of their arrest, they be released on bail on their furnishing personal bond in the sum of 40,000/-with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer with the condition that they shall join the investigation as and when required.

¶19

The petitioners shall deposit ` 1,00,000/- each within two weeks before the Registrar General of this Court. This amount shall be kept in interest bearing FDRs.

¶20

In case of non-compliance, the complainant/State shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

¶21

Bail Applications stand disposed of.

¶22

S.P.GARG, J.

¶23

APRIL 17, 2018/ p

¶24

BAIL APPLN. 555/2018 & connected matter

¶25

Page 2 of 2

Zahid Hussain v. State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Zahid Hussain v. State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishan Singh Chauhan & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Alok Sharma & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sumit Verma & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Asha Rani & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Parents of Adult Girls & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Anil @ Andla Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi